Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Tuesday’s Economic Calendar

    April 7, 2026

    K-Pop Band Seventeen’s Recipe for Career Longevity: Be Best Friends

    April 7, 2026

    Casey's General Stores set to join S&P 500

    April 7, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    Home»Economy»Tariffs on Canada and Mexico Are Way Worse Than Tariffs on China
    Economy

    Tariffs on Canada and Mexico Are Way Worse Than Tariffs on China

    Press RoomBy Press RoomJanuary 27, 2025No Comments3 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    Some bad news and then some good news and then some bad news.

    Bad News

    On January 21, on his first full day in office, President Trump threatened to impose a 10% tariff rate on imports from China. His beef is that “China,” whatever that means (cue co-blogger Pierre Lemieux), is sending to Mexico chemical ingredients (precursor chemicals) that are used to make fentanyl.

    I was a little surprised by this—not that Trump did it, but that the tariff rate he proposes is “only” 10 percent. Why was I surprised? During the campaign, he threatened to impose a 60% tariff on Chinese imports. Ten percent is only one sixth of 60%. Moreover, he threatens 10% on Chinese imports at the same time he threatens a whopping 25% tariff rate on imports from Mexico and Canada.

     

    Good News

    There is good news here. The damage done by a 10% tariff is not 1/6 of the damage done by a 60% tariff. It’s only 1/36.

    How do I get that? There’s a basic theorem in economics, one that I taught my students with simple algebra, that says the deadweight loss from a tax is proportional, not to the tax rate, but to the square of the tax rate. If Trump were to impose a 60% tax rate, therefore, the deadweight loss (DWL) from that would be 36 times the DWL from a 10% tax rate.

    The deadweight loss is the loss in consumer surplus and producer surplus from a tax.

     

    Bad news

    It’s also important to note that imports of goods from China were about $440 billion. Imports of goods from Canada and Mexico together were about $410 billion (Canada) plus about $500 billion (Mexico) for a total of over $900 billion. In other words, imports of goods from Canada and Mexico were about double imports of goods from China.

    The deadweight loss from a tax is proportional to the quantity of the item taxed. The value of imports equals the quantity times the price. But in running the DWL formula we can approximately cancel out price from China on the one hand and Mexico and Canada on the other.

    So here’s the bottom line. If Trump goes ahead with the 10% tariff on China and the 25% tariff on Canada and Mexico, the DWL from the tariffs on Canada and Mexico will be 6.25 times 2 times the DWL on tariffs on China. I get 6.25 by squaring 2.5 (25% divided by 10%) and 2 from $900 billion divided by $440 billion. 6.25 * 2 and = 12.5. So the deadweight loss from Trump’s proposal tariffs on Canada and Mexico is approximately 12.5 times the DWL from the proposed 10% tariff on China.

     

    Notes: For simplicity, I’m assuming that the baseline tariff rate before these proposed tariffs is 0. That’s not quite true and the results would change a little if I made it more accurate. Also, the triangle in the picture is the deadweight loss from a tax.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Press Room

    Related Posts

    Wall Street slides as valuation concerns, rate-cut jitters linger

    November 18, 2025

    Wall St opens lower as valuation concerns, rate-cut jitters linger

    November 18, 2025

    They solved for the Kansas City Chiefs enforcement equilibrium

    September 5, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    LATEST NEWS

    Tuesday’s Economic Calendar

    April 7, 2026

    K-Pop Band Seventeen’s Recipe for Career Longevity: Be Best Friends

    April 7, 2026

    Casey's General Stores set to join S&P 500

    April 7, 2026

    The Iran war is driving up produce prices

    April 7, 2026
    POPULAR
    Business

    The Business of Formula One

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    Weddings and divorce: the scourge of investment returns

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    How F1 found a secret fuel to accelerate media rights growth

    May 27, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!

    Archives

    • April 2026
    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • May 2023

    Categories

    • Business
    • Crypto
    • Economy
    • Forex
    • Futures & Commodities
    • Investing
    • Market Data
    • Money
    • News
    • Personal Finance
    • Politics
    • Stocks
    • Technology

    Your source for the serious news. This demo is crafted specifically to exhibit the use of the theme as a news site. Visit our main page for more demos.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Buy Now
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.