Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Protecting Investments With Staking and Risk-Managed Yield

    March 6, 2026

    Jobs Report Live Updates: What to Expect After Robust January Gain

    March 6, 2026

    A Longevity and Sports Medicine Doctor Shares His Workout Routine

    March 6, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    Home»Money»Trump Lawyer Calls Jan. 6 a Shameful ‘Riot’ in Tense Supreme Court Exchange
    Money

    Trump Lawyer Calls Jan. 6 a Shameful ‘Riot’ in Tense Supreme Court Exchange

    Press RoomBy Press RoomFebruary 8, 2024No Comments2 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    An attorney for former President Donald Trump argued Thursday before the US Supreme Court that the January 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol was just a “riot” during a tense back-and-forth exchange with one of the high court’s liberal justices over what constitutes an “insurrection.”

    “Why would this not be an insurrection?” Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson asked lawyer Jonathan Mitchell as the nine justices of the Supreme Court were hearing oral arguments in a landmark case over whether Trump — the GOP frontrunner — can remain on Colorado’s primary ballot ahead of the 2024 election.

    Mitchell responded, “For an insurrection, there needs to be an organized concerted effort to overthrow the government of the United States through violence.”

    Brown shot back, “And so, the point is that a chaotic effort to overthrow the government is not an insurrection?”

    Mitchell went on to say, “We didn’t concede that it’s an effort to overthrow the government either,” and chalked up the deadly events of January 6 to a “shameful” “riot.”

    “None of these criteria were met. This was a riot. It was not an insurrection. The events were shameful, criminal, violent, all of those things, but did not qualify as an insurrection as that term is used in Section 3” of the 14th Amendment, Mitchell said.

    Brown’s question to Mitchell came nearly an hour after open arguments in the case began.

    Earlier, the liberal justice noted that the Colorado Supreme Court — which ruled that Trump incited protesters before the January 6 attack and therefore violated the 14th Amendment — qualified the events of that day as an “insurrection” as defined by Section 3.

    “I read your opening brief to accept that those events counted as an insurrection, but then your reply seemed to suggest that they were not, so what is your position to that,” Brown asked Mitchell.

    Mitchell explained, “We never accepted or conceded in our opening brief that this was an insurrection. What we said in our opening brief was President Trump did not engage in any act that can plausibly be characterized as an insurrection.”

    Trump is fighting back against the Colorado top court’s ruling that deemed him disqualified from running for president and holding office over his actions on January 6 and his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

    Most legal experts on constitutional law say the US Supreme Court is likely to side with Trump.

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Press Room

    Related Posts

    Jobs Report Live Updates: What to Expect After Robust January Gain

    March 6, 2026

    A Longevity and Sports Medicine Doctor Shares His Workout Routine

    March 6, 2026

    Chamath Palihapitiya Argument With Critic Ends With College Fund Offer

    March 6, 2026
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    LATEST NEWS

    Protecting Investments With Staking and Risk-Managed Yield

    March 6, 2026

    Jobs Report Live Updates: What to Expect After Robust January Gain

    March 6, 2026

    A Longevity and Sports Medicine Doctor Shares His Workout Routine

    March 6, 2026

    $2.6 Billion Options Expiry With Volatility Expected

    March 6, 2026
    POPULAR
    Business

    The Business of Formula One

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    Weddings and divorce: the scourge of investment returns

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    How F1 found a secret fuel to accelerate media rights growth

    May 27, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!

    Archives

    • March 2026
    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • May 2023

    Categories

    • Business
    • Crypto
    • Economy
    • Forex
    • Futures & Commodities
    • Investing
    • Market Data
    • Money
    • News
    • Personal Finance
    • Politics
    • Stocks
    • Technology

    Your source for the serious news. This demo is crafted specifically to exhibit the use of the theme as a news site. Visit our main page for more demos.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Buy Now
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.