Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Novo Nordisk stock posts worst week since 2021, but analysts see a bigger problem ahead

    August 2, 2025

    Trump moves nuclear submarines near Russia: what triggered the move and what’s ahead

    August 2, 2025

    Private equity giants accelerate push into UK pension risk-transfer market

    August 2, 2025
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    Home»Economy»Eminent Domain and the Problem of Government
    Economy

    Eminent Domain and the Problem of Government

    Press RoomBy Press RoomJuly 31, 2025No Comments5 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email


    In our forthcoming paper at the Review of Law & Economics, “The Long-Term Impact of Kelo v. City of New London: Comparing State Legislative and Judicial Responses”, my former Western Carolina University colleagues Ed Lopez and H. Justin Pace and I discuss justifications for eminent domain.[1] Primarily, we discuss the holdout problem. The holdout problem describes a rent-seeking seller who holds off selling to maximize their gain, but at the expense of the entire project. Eminent domain can be used to overcome this challenge, in which case, eminent domain can be welfare-enhancing.
    (This post is not about the holdout problem.  For details, see Section 2 of our article.)

    Related to the holdout problem is the problem that occurs when the cost of negotiating may be prohibitively high for a necessary public works project.  (Indeed, I’d argue this is the best use of eminent domain, but that is neither here nor there.)  Take, for example, an old city, say Boston.  Boston was founded in the 1630s, a period long before the benefits of modern sanitation and sewer systems were understood.  Boston grew and grew, and consequently so did human waste and sanitation needs.  Eventually, we was discovered that dumping human waste in the streets and rivers was not the best idea, and cities began constructing the modern wonder that is a sewer system.[2]  But, by the time the modern sewer system of Boston began construction in 1877, the city was already good-sized: some 46,000 people lived there.  There were many property owners involved whose property may need to be infringed upon to connect this system and make Boston healthier.

    Negotiations among all these owners would likely have been prohibitively expensive (even excluding the problem of holdouts or strategic bargaining).  Consequently, at several times during the process, the city invoked eminent domain to take necessary actions (the powers are now codified in Title XIV, Chapter 83 of the Massachusetts General Laws).  This is likely a good use of eminent domain powers: a general case of improving general welfare (as opposed to the more squishy “social benefits exceed social costs” used by some economists). Here, eminent domain represented the least costly way to achieve the goal.  Other old cities around the world likely faced the same issues and used eminent domain to manage them as well.

    But does this case mean that eminent domain for a sewer system is always a good thing?  For the sake of answering this question, let’s assume that a sewer system construction is in and of itself an improvement in general welfare.

    I argue that the answer to my question is “no.”

    Let’s move away from old cities and say we want to create a new city: Murphopolis. Murphopolis will be somewhere in the vast Arizona desert.  Some 46,000 people journey to the middle of that desert and, among the spiders, scorpions, and blazing heat, start building a town.  In 2025, the benefits of a sewer system are well-known.  In the construction of this city, eminent domain is not necessary: property contracts can be written to incorporate the necessary easements and connections.  The sewer system can arise naturally.  Indeed, one may not even need a government-run or -provided sewer system at all!  Anyone wanting to invoke eminent domain for a sewer project should face a higher standard of scrutiny.

    Moving to the more general problem of government, many advocates for government actions simply point to the action being used in the past to solve some problem and then conclude that the same action is appropriate.  But the time and conditions of the current problem are not the same as in the past.  Just because eminent domain was a good solution for Problem A does not mean it is a good solution for Problem B.  Using eminent domain to build the Boston sewer system is beneficial; using it to build the Murphopolis sewer system is likely harmful.

    Thus, what I see as a problem of government: the proper use of its power, as opposed to power’s haphazard use.  Government does have a positive role to play.  But those “men of system” (to borrow Adam Smith’s phrase) undermine the good of government by using it haphazardly.[3]

    —

    [1] Ed discusses the paper more generally here.

    [2] I do not use “wonder” lightly.  Think about it: we all have these tiny holes in our home that we put waste, contaminants, and non-potable water into and it gets whisked away to be properly treated and disposed.  Think of how much cleaner and safer our lives are!  How many have been spared horrible deaths or illness from diseases like cholera, dysentery, and other water/food/waste born illnesses simply by taking the sources away via this little holes?

    [3] As a final aside, I’d argue that most of the evils of government come not from intentional abuse of power by evil men, but rather by this haphazard approach to government.  Like a child playing with a loaded gun, their misconceptions and ignorance can lead to terrible consequences not intended.



    Source link

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Press Room

    Related Posts

    In which ways is the BLS biased?

    August 2, 2025

    Saturday assorted links

    August 2, 2025

    The Indian Wedding

    August 2, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    LATEST NEWS

    Novo Nordisk stock posts worst week since 2021, but analysts see a bigger problem ahead

    August 2, 2025

    Trump moves nuclear submarines near Russia: what triggered the move and what’s ahead

    August 2, 2025

    Private equity giants accelerate push into UK pension risk-transfer market

    August 2, 2025

    5 Things AT&T’s Blunt Memo Says About Future of Corporate America

    August 2, 2025
    POPULAR
    Business

    The Business of Formula One

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    Weddings and divorce: the scourge of investment returns

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    How F1 found a secret fuel to accelerate media rights growth

    May 27, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!

    Archives

    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • May 2023

    Categories

    • Business
    • Crypto
    • Economy
    • Forex
    • Futures & Commodities
    • Investing
    • Market Data
    • Money
    • News
    • Personal Finance
    • Politics
    • Stocks
    • Technology

    Your source for the serious news. This demo is crafted specifically to exhibit the use of the theme as a news site. Visit our main page for more demos.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Buy Now
    © 2025 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.