Close Menu
    What's Hot

    Super Bowl LX Ads Lean on Comedy and Celebrity in a Volatile Climate

    February 1, 2026

    Bitcoin’s 7% Drop to $77K May Mark Cycle Low, Analyst Says

    February 1, 2026

    Who Will Win an Oscar, According to Kalshi and Polymarket

    February 1, 2026
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    • Home
    • News
    • Politics
    • Money
    • Personal Finance
    • Business
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Markets
      • Stocks
      • Futures & Commodities
      • Crypto
      • Forex
    • Technology
    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram
    Hot Paths
    Home»Business»BYD’s aggressive push is setting baseline for what an EV should cost
    Business

    BYD’s aggressive push is setting baseline for what an EV should cost

    Press RoomBy Press RoomMay 28, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

    Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

    Car prices are on the rise around the world. Yet despite this inflationary wave, one carmaker is moving in the opposite direction. BYD has cut prices on 22 of its electric and hybrid models, bringing the price of its popular Seagull electric vehicle below that of a high-end road bike.

    At first glance, it may seem like a desperate attempt to boost sales in a slowing market. But that reading misses the bigger picture.

    The Seagull, already a global outlier for its low price, has dropped further to just Rmb55,800 ($7,780) in China. The most dramatic cut was for the Seal dual motor hybrid, which fell by Rmb53,000 to Rmb102,800. 

    These price cuts come as the EV industry enters a new phase. While total sales remain high, growth is slowing. In China, dealerships held 3.5mn unsold EVs as of April, the highest level since December 2023. 

    Most carmakers would respond cautiously to a slowdown, cutting production and incentives. The reason BYD can afford to take the offensive is its unique cost structure rooted in vertical integration. It makes its own batteries, designs its chips and tightly controls operations.

    That cost advantage means that when rivals cut prices, it is at the expense of fragile margins. When BYD cuts prices, it buys market share and future pricing power. Despite multiple rounds of price cuts in recent years, some as steep as 30 per cent, gross margins have continued to rise since 2021, reflecting its margin buffer.

    This ability to undercut rivals without sacrificing profitability marks a broader shift in the EV value proposition. Legacy automakers have priced EVs as premium products, citing technology costs and brand value. BYD’s approach challenges that assumption, leaving rivals fewer ways to justify higher prices.

    Some critics argue that its aggressive pricing may not be sustainable. A concern is that ultra-low prices could trigger a race to the bottom, squeezing profits across the industry. As it expands globally, higher regulatory, labour and logistics costs could also push the limits of its efficiency. 

    But for now, BYD’s financials remain strong. Gross margin of nearly 20 per cent in the first quarter outpaced Tesla’s 16 per cent and most local rivals still operating at a loss. BYD shares are up 80 per cent in the past year, reflecting expectations that its pricing strategy could reshape the global EV market, even after a 10 per cent drop following price cuts.

    Its latest round of price cuts is forcing its competitors into a corner: either match the discounts and absorb financial strain, or maintain pricing and lose volume. For weaker rivals, consolidation may become unavoidable.

    There is little precedent for this level of aggressive pricing in the auto industry. But there are clear parallels with the smartphone wars of the 2010s. After 2013, smartphone hardware became commoditised and consumer expectations shifted from novelty to value. The market moved from innovation-driven growth, with more than 50 companies competing globally, to scale-driven consolidation. Brands such as LG, Sony Ericsson, Nokia, Motorola and BlackBerry, which once defined major product segments, faded quickly as margins collapsed. Only vertically integrated makers with global scale — Apple and Samsung — retained pricing power and market control. 

    Carmakers are coming under similar pressure: in Europe, where they are adapting to the economics of electrification, BYD’s price shock adds urgency. Last month, it surpassed Tesla in regional EV sales for the first time, with Tesla’s volume down 49 per cent, while BYD’s rose 169 per cent. In Singapore, it became the top-selling brand, outselling Toyota despite its models being priced on par.

    This rapid expansion underscores how BYD is saturating the EV market across all segments, from entry level to premium, suggesting that even a premium only strategy will no longer be a haven for global automakers.

    Global legacy carmakers, many of which have operated on the sidelines of China’s price wars, face an uncomfortable reality. Even outside China, they must justify significantly higher prices for comparable models in key markets such as Europe, south-east Asia and Latin America.

    As a result, EV competition is becoming a game of margins that few are positioned to win. More than any single innovation, BYD’s greatest disruption has been resetting the baseline for what an EV should cost.

    june.yoon@ft.com

    Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
    Press Room

    Related Posts

    City fears mount that Budget will target banks to help fill £20bn fiscal hole

    August 29, 2025

    Renewable food is on the horizon

    August 28, 2025

    Bankers learn of firings via premature email to hand back their laptops

    August 28, 2025
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    LATEST NEWS

    Super Bowl LX Ads Lean on Comedy and Celebrity in a Volatile Climate

    February 1, 2026

    Bitcoin’s 7% Drop to $77K May Mark Cycle Low, Analyst Says

    February 1, 2026

    Who Will Win an Oscar, According to Kalshi and Polymarket

    February 1, 2026

    Long NZD/USD: strong rebound from multi-year support and dovish fed weakness point toward continued upside

    February 1, 2026
    POPULAR
    Business

    The Business of Formula One

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    Weddings and divorce: the scourge of investment returns

    May 27, 2023
    Business

    How F1 found a secret fuel to accelerate media rights growth

    May 27, 2023
    Advertisement
    Load WordPress Sites in as fast as 37ms!

    Archives

    • February 2026
    • January 2026
    • December 2025
    • November 2025
    • October 2025
    • September 2025
    • August 2025
    • July 2025
    • June 2025
    • May 2025
    • April 2025
    • March 2025
    • February 2025
    • January 2025
    • December 2024
    • November 2024
    • April 2024
    • March 2024
    • February 2024
    • January 2024
    • December 2023
    • November 2023
    • October 2023
    • September 2023
    • May 2023

    Categories

    • Business
    • Crypto
    • Economy
    • Forex
    • Futures & Commodities
    • Investing
    • Market Data
    • Money
    • News
    • Personal Finance
    • Politics
    • Stocks
    • Technology

    Your source for the serious news. This demo is crafted specifically to exhibit the use of the theme as a news site. Visit our main page for more demos.

    We're social. Connect with us:

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest YouTube

    Subscribe to Updates

    Get the latest creative news from FooBar about art, design and business.

    Facebook X (Twitter) Instagram Pinterest
    • Home
    • Buy Now
    © 2026 ThemeSphere. Designed by ThemeSphere.

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.